Eva Young Gains
"Rise Lunation" was taken at a spot, walking distance from where I live in a rural community, 600 meters up in the foothills of northern Italy, there are agricultural and industrial plains down to the north and mountains over southward. I can be technically minded but it's not usually my priority and I tend not to plan, if I haven't been out in the skies for a while especially at twilight times I get pretty tetchy. I decided I needed to make time over winter festivities, I desired to be with a ripening Moon as it rose and to savour the anticipation. Boxing Day 2015 was a day after the full Moon so I set my sights on that and even checked for a more precise time or so I thought, to be in place in good time, at an eastern vantage point.
My camera, a Canon SX 50 HS, was already and luckily mounted onto my tripod as I arrived - quite simply because I had moved from a western site observing Mercury setting. As I reached the eastern vantage brow, I was surprised to see the Moon already up, so the timing was all wrong. I flipped into action all once yet stunned by the intensity from the Moons mass, a deep shimmering sulphur glow, like an apocalyptical Sun - I was turning the camera on, grappling with the tripod legs for even ground, setting focus to manual - infinity, timer to 2 seconds, light metering to centre, tightening tripod fixings and trying to zoom the Moon centrally in the frame which was tricky given the excitement. I usually zoom to x100 with moon portraits but had to make do with x75 which equates with 215mm as everything was moving so fast. I took 8 shots in 2 minutes by which time the Moon had steadied already and ripples lessened.
Other technical decisions I can say were conditioned by the earlier Mercury observations - in the heat of the moment I hadn't checked the ISO, which increases light sensitivity, this was set at 400, I'd up-ed it earlier to capture Mercury and luckily this also worked well for the conditions of "Rise Lunation". The aperture, lens opening was as low as it could go at f/6.5 and this to be clear is not very low at all, usually astrophotographers want to go down to 2.5, I can go to 3.5 when not using the zoom which further restricts that. This is why I will compensate with ISO up to 900s although ISO does not work on my camera with speeds slower than 1 second which is also restrictive. The technical spec of the image, all said and done is 215mm, f/6.5, ISO 400, half a second.
Post processing is controversial because different people have different ideas - I tend and try to do as little as possible, I also try not to crop but did a small amount purely to centre it better since I'd struggled with that in the field - and for this reason I didn't crop it perfectly central, something the art curator Melanie Vandenbrouk over an exchange had picked up on with glee. A couple of fellow prize winners asked me at the judge's brunch if I'd used a filter, the answer being, no! No filter, no contrast, no saturation, no nothing and just one exposure. Other times, I may tweak an image if I feel it helps to draw out a truer representation or highlight a feature but I did not feel this to be necessary in this case, only potentially detract, being already as near perfect in representation of what I witnessed. It's not unusual particularly for astrophotographs to stack and stitch many images, great techniques to accentuate details adding depth and so on, again not something I felt to be necessary here. It's important to me to share my passion for the many Moon shapes and phases not just the more familiar and tidy ones.
Browse previous issues here
The SPNews welcomes articles, features, reviews, ideas, art work and photography.
The Ed's email is always open.